Ecosystem Condition: The Key to Achieving COP16 Biodiversity Goals

There is a huge amount at stake at COP16. A critical moment to reflect on what we have delivered and actioned since the promises we made in Montreal. The call to action is clear: we need to adopt robust, site-based nature data to make the best decisions for our planet.  

Ecosystem Condition provides a practical, scalable, and ecologically meaningful way to measure and manage our impacts on nature. By integrating these metrics into their operations, businesses and financial institutions can play a pivotal role in the global effort to halt and reverse biodiversity loss.

In this second instalment of our series on Ecosystem Condition, we explore why this metric is the nature tool businesses and financial institutions have been searching for, and how it can become a cornerstone in the mission to halt and reverse nature loss.

What is Ecosystem Condition?

Following the UN SEEA Ecosystem Accounting definition, Ecosystem Condition is the quality of an ecosystem that may reflect multiple values, measured in terms of its abiotic and biotic characteristics across a range of temporal and spatial scales. All major biodiversity frameworks and standards (TNFD, SBTN, GRI, CSRD, and SFDR), as well as emerging biodiversity credit methodologies, require site-level Ecosystem Condition measurements.

Ecosystem Condition is comprised of various condition variables that are typically set against reference levels—either a desired management target or a reference condition. These variables are combined with measures of ecosystem extent, which reflects the size of the area covered by the ecosystem, providing an overall measure of the state of an ecosystem asset. This metric is commonly subdivided into three categories: Structure, Composition, and Function.

Why We Need Ecosystem Condition Metrics

The degradation of ecosystems affects not only the natural world but also the communities and businesses that rely on their services, such as pollination, flood mitigation, and soil fertility. Recognizing this, new regulatory and voluntary frameworks are being developed to help businesses frame and disclose their interactions with nature more effectively. Yet, amid this flurry of reporting requirements, a critical question remains: how do we accurately measure nature?

Ecosystem Condition offers a structured, comprehensive approach to this challenge. It allows us to measure the quality of ecosystems by assessing their structure, species composition, and function. This metric is adaptable across various ecosystems—from coral reefs to grasslands—and provides a unified framework applicable in marine, coastal, and terrestrial contexts. By standardizing how we measure ecosystem health, Ecosystem Condition facilitates a move from broad-brush assessments to detailed, site-specific evaluations, empowering stakeholders to make informed, data-driven decisions.

NatureMetrics’ Approach: Integrating Technology for Robust Data

At NatureMetrics, we are pioneering a science-based approach to Ecosystem Condition by integrating advanced technologies like environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis, high-resolution satellite sensing, and bioacoustics. These tools enable us to gather accurate, verifiable data that reflect the true condition of ecosystems at a granular level. By 'ground-truthing' this data—measuring it directly on-site—we provide a level of precision that model-based data alone cannot achieve. This approach is essential for capturing the actual state of ecosystems and tracking changes over time.

We have spent months reading and reviewing thousands of pages of documentation to develop a comprehensive approach to Ecosystem Condition.

We have arrived at a set of variables and a framework for collecting the data that adheres to UN guidance and provide a holistic enough view of ecosystems to be used for Ecosystem Condition monitoring.

Our framework assesses ecosystems through three core components:

1. Structure: We use satellite data and other remote observation technologies to characterize key variables like Above Ground Biomass and Connectivity, which are essential for maintaining ecosystem integrity.

2. Composition: We utilize eDNA and bioacoustics to analyze species communities, capturing the diversity and complexity of life within ecosystems. This allows us to understand not just which species are present, but how these species interact and change over time.

3. Function: By integrating species data with ecological functional databases, we can evaluate critical ecological processes such as nutrient cycling, plant growth, and food web dynamics. This holistic view provides insights into how ecosystems function and maintain resilience.

By working closely with accreditation organisations like Accounting for Nature, we are committed to ensuring the quality and rigour of our methodologies. Collaborations such as this will make it easier for businesses to integrate Ecosystem Condition data into their broader sustainability strategies and reporting frameworks.  

The Journey Towards a Nature-Positive Economy

The journey towards integrating biodiversity considerations into business operations may seem overwhelming, but it is a step-by-step process. Companies are encouraged to build their knowledge base, understand their relationship with nature and biodiversity, and respond accordingly. This transformation involves not only individual companies but also their supply chains, contributing to a broader shift towards a sustainable economy.

Ultimately, the goal is to move beyond mere compliance and tick-box exercises. Companies need to take meaningful action and avoid treating sustainability reporting as just another regulatory requirement. By truly understanding and managing their relationship with nature, businesses can drive the transition to a nature-positive economy. Through embedding nature metrics like Ecosystem Condition into their decision-making processes, businesses can shift from reactive measures to proactive, strategic management of their environmental impacts.

Bridging the Gap: From Metrics to Meaningful Action

For businesses, Ecosystem Condition metrics offer a way to move beyond theoretical models and hypothetical scenarios. They provide tangible data on the ground conditions of ecosystems, making it easier for companies to understand their environmental impact, set meaningful targets, and track progress towards nature-positive goals. This metric also aligns with the needs of major biodiversity frameworks, such as TNFD and CSRD, which encourage companies to adopt robust, site-specific data to enhance their reporting and accountability.

Ambitions and Hopes for COP16

I am incredibly proud of the work we're doing at NatureMetrics on Ecosystem Condition. By putting robust, site-based data at the heart of nature measurement, we're not just ticking boxes; we're empowering real, actionable change. As the negotiations play out at COP16, I'm eagerly anticipating positive and important conversations with our customers and partners. It’s an opportunity to ensure that Ecosystem Condition metrics are baked into long-term nature monitoring and reporting plans, aligning with our collective mission to halt biodiversity loss and promote a sustainable future.

NatureMetrics is dedicated to leading this charge, offering innovative solutions that empower organizations to measure, mitigate, and ultimately improve their impact on nature. As we continue this series, we’ll explore how Ecosystem Condition metrics complement other biodiversity measures, ensuring that companies can make informed, impactful decisions on their journey towards a nature-positive future.

We are actively encouraging companies to engage with us to explore how these metrics can support their journey towards more sustainable practices. Contact NatureMetrics to learn how our Ecosystem Condition metrics can support your reporting needs and help you take the next step towards nature-positive.  

‍